Форум сервера Counter-Strike компании IPTelecom

Dr.Salvator написал:

:.:War Lords:.: | GhOst написал:

u can write in any language u want

Chrome ymmärää kaikki?

Lisä vodka, "salon" kanssa ja kaikki on tulkittava...

Dr.Salvator написал:

Lucky Loser написал:

ollitko Suomessa?? aaaaah, sun ip on Virosta

Olen ollut Venäjällä, Ruotsissa, myös Suomessa, monissa paikoissa...

Täma IP juttu on ihan OK

yep i can read it all thanks to my chrome

Koskenkorva sux, rakastan olutta

higher ping limit in low latency is 70  its should be 100 or 110 ..... high latency lower ping limit is 40  it should be 100 ....... player with 280 ping has no match for player having 40 ping .....   but i think you are not going to listen world is so cruel 

Px написал:

Sad-Flute написал:

higher ping limit in low latency is 70 90

fixed

 
lower ping limit in high latency ??
it should be 80 now i think

:.:War Lords:.: | GhOst написал:

Sad-Flute написал:

high latency lower ping limit is 40  it should be 100

no man no
if u do that we will lose half of our good players like bb5, earl, harmony, etc   
Px dont do it pls

they are good players only beouse they got low ping and thats big advantage to them ...... thats not fair ....

:.:War Lords:.: | GhOst написал:

Sad-Flute написал:

they are good players only beouse they got low ping and thats big advantage to them

i dont believe that 

i dont say they are not good player but i say they got ping advantage ....... px said he is not going to decrease ping limit to 200 so he must increast lower limit to 80 (still better than 40 pingers ) ....... if bb5 or any other player have high ping more than 80 they can play on high latency

Sad-Flute написал:

:.:War Lords:.: | GhOst написал:

Sad-Flute написал:

high latency lower ping limit is 40  it should be 100

no man no
if u do that we will lose half of our good players like bb5, earl, harmony, etc   
Px dont do it pls

they are good players only beouse they got low ping and thats big advantage to them ...... thats not fair ....

I am curious to see your reaction when you will play with low latency and see you arent better..

NorthNikko написал:

Sad-Flute написал:

:.:War Lords:.: | GhOst написал:

no man no
if u do that we will lose half of our good players like bb5, earl, harmony, etc   
Px dont do it pls

they are good players only beouse they got low ping and thats big advantage to them ...... thats not fair ....

I am curious to see your reaction when you will play with low latency and see you arent better..

whats your point i didnt say i am better player than them but my point is that its not fair that low pinger like in 50s play with players  having ping more than 200

Sad-Flute написал:

i didnt say i am better player than them

no man thats not what we are talking about dont get us wrong

NorthNikko написал:

"they are good players only beouse they got low ping"
I say : no.
I have got 70 ping usually, which is not a low ping and i am often the first of my team. I can say the same thing for Mastermind or Kaje O boy (his ping is now about 110). So low ping DOESNT make you good player. so dont say "They are good players ONLY because of it", itùs totally false.

never mind

:.:War Lords:.: | GhOst написал:

ping has nothing to do with ur play

what can i say